Austrian ‘Rebel Farmer’ Holzer and His Permaculture

Those who have studied permaculture will likely be familiar with the name Sepp Holzer. As a pioneer of permaculture in practice, Holzer is almost a household name in Austria, and his book, *Permaculture*, has served as an introductory guide for enthusiasts across the globe.

●Holzer’s *Permaculture* has been published in several languages; right: Krameterhof, where he first practised permaculture. Left image source: Douban Read.

This June, I travelled deep into the Central Alps to visit Krameterhof, the farm founded by Holzer, where I joined over twenty students from around the world for a two-day guided tour and training course organised by the farm.

Over a decade ago, the elderly Holzer handed the management of this 45-hectare farm over to his son. The highly gregarious Josef Andreas Holzer led us through the intensive two-day course.

●Josef Andreas Holzer standing in the pond.
To begin with, Holzer introduced the three principles of permaculture derived from two generations of practical experience: learning from nature, respecting limits, and reflection. Following the theoretical introduction, Holzer led us to a nearby man-made pond that was currently being renovated. The construction of these terraced ponds marked the farm’s shift towards alternative practices and has remained its most defining characteristic.

I. Learning from Nature

Holzer explained that in the early 1960s, just as his father took over the decaying farm from his grandfather, he began constructing ponds on the hillsides. Based on these terraced ponds, the farm has developed a self-sufficient alpine agricultural system that integrates land and water cycles.

The Central Alpine region where Kramhof farm is located is relatively arid; rainfall is sparse and irregular, meaning a single heavy downpour can trigger flash floods.

While these are natural disasters, they are exacerbated by human activity: since the 18th century, the expansion of intensive farming and forestry led to the filling in of original ponds and lakes on the slopes to make way for food crops or commercial timber. The reconstruction of the ponds is intended to restore the local natural landscape and ecosystem, thereby mitigating the destructive impact of flash floods.

● One of the 72 terraced ponds at Komehof Farm.

Beyond their function in flood prevention, the Nordic crayfish bred in these ponds are one of the farm’s primary sources of revenue.

In 2022, I spent more than six months conducting fieldwork on the aquaculture industry in the Sangyuanwei area of Foshan. This experience left me particularly interested in the self-sufficiency of integrated land-water circular agriculture. China’s traditional mulberry dike-fish pond system is a closed-loop system: the nutrient-rich pond mud is frequently used as fertiliser for the mulberry trees planted along the banks. Consequently, I asked the younger Holzer whether he composted his pond mud.

He gave a solemn “no”: “If I were to use the pond mud for composting, my heart would bleed.”

In intensive aquaculture, failure to clear the ponds in a timely manner leads to an accumulation of leftover feed and fish waste on the bottom. This often results in eutrophication, leaving the mud black and foul-smelling, which in turn triggers fish diseases. At Komehof Farm, however, the stocking density is low, allowing the pond’s natural ecosystem to remain largely in balance. An abundance of benthic organisms plays a crucial role in decomposition, ensuring the mud never becomes a threat to the crayfish and fish.

● The younger Holzer shows us the Nordic crayfish and the pristine waters of the terraced lakes.

We continued winding our way along the mountain paths, where various terraces were staggered and nestled into the contours of the landscape, each serving a distinct purpose.

The farm’s cattle roam and forage freely across the slopes. Here, the younger Holzer has planted a valuable medicinal herb: *Gastrodia elata*. We were concerned that the cattle might graze on the Gastrodia, thereby impacting the farm’s revenue.

He explained with a touch of pride that his experiments had shown the cattle avoid the Gastrodia due to its bitter taste. Instead, they graze on other weeds, effectively clearing space for the herb to thrive.

● *Gastrodia elata* and cattle. Right image source: Komehof Farm official website.
On the hillside far from the residential areas, the younger Holzer planted cherry trees for the wild birds, not merely because they serve as seed dispersers. Wild birds are averse to the noise of human activity; provided there are alternative foraging opportunities, they will avoid the orchards near the living quarters, thereby preventing losses for the farm.

Perhaps it was this abundance of seed-eating birds that attracted a pair of buzzards to make their home here. These buzzards do more than hunt small birds; they occasionally steal chicks from the farm—a kind of “payment” for their services. For the farm, golden eagles, which prey on adult chickens and geese, pose a far greater threat; the buzzards, in defending their territory, occasionally drive these eagles away.

During a visit to the farm, the way the two Holzers approach collaboration with animals is deeply impressive. In the fields of anthropology and cultural studies, multi-species ethnography has long been a common research methodology, aimed at observing the role non-human actors play in constructing social, economic, and political relationships, rather than viewing humans as the sole agents of action. Komehof Farm serves as a textbook example of multi-species collaboration, demonstrating how animals participate in the construction of an agro-ecosystem.

II. Respecting Limitations

During my research at Sangyuanwei in Foshan, I discovered that balancing ecological sustainability with economic viability is far from straightforward within the current landscape of intensive aquaculture, given a multitude of complex constraints. Consequently, I was keen to understand how the two Holzers perceive the limitations of permaculture in practice, and how they might use reflection to turn these disadvantages into strengths.

The natural conditions at Komehof Farm are hardly idyllic; the climate is cold, with long, brutal winters. Caught unprepared, we found ourselves shivering even in the summer as we listened to the younger Holzer explain his agricultural philosophy. “If you want to pursue sustainable farming,” he emphasised, “you must avoid over-relying on modern technology to the point where you push the land beyond its limits.”

Many believe the Alpine slopes on which the farm sits are suited only for pine plantations and grazing, yet in reality, intensive livestock farming is one of the primary drivers of soil degradation in the Alps. Both Holzers reject the high-intensity exploitation of the land. By restoring traditional terraced pond systems, they have overcome the challenges of water retention on sloping terrain, while simultaneously creating a foundation for a diverse range of crops and livestock.

● Adapting to local conditions—is that not, in itself, a form of respecting limitations? The “Hügelkultur” (mound cultivation) documented by Holzer in his work on permaculture has been practised for centuries in Germany and Eastern Europe. This technique of creating raised cultivation beds from decaying wood to improve the soil provides excellent heat and water retention. Above: The Wisdom Tooth on the Cliff

The younger Holzer also spoke of the limitations of the farmer. Rather than implementing rigid, blueprint-style master plans from the outset, they initiate small, experimental projects each year based on the farm’s current state. He believes that truly understanding a specific piece of land is a slow process; overestimating one’s own abilities or their understanding of nature often proves counterproductive.

In truth, the farm’s experimental projects often fail. However, because each project requires minimal investment, such failures do not result in significant losses. Once a project succeeds, it can be effectively integrated into the farm’s existing ecosystem, driving the farm’s prosperity.

For instance, the farm now has 72 ponds of varying shapes and functions. Interconnected to form a water network, these ponds utilise the difference in elevation to generate hydroelectric power, which is largely sufficient to meet the farm’s daily needs.

● The farm’s water mill generates electricity by utilising a head of over 400 metres between the various ponds.

The actions of the two Holzers may seem rebellious, yet they are built upon a pragmatic foundation. Whenever they undertake “unconventional” experiments, they carefully weigh the economic benefits. In the course, the younger Holzer emphasised the importance of ecological diversity several times, but what I heard was not clichéd moralising, but rather pragmatic economic considerations.

He told us that diversification has saved the farm on several occasions. For example, after the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, radioactive particles drifted across Central and Western Europe, leaving people in Germany and Austria fearful of eating mushrooms. As late as 2021, Caesium-137 levels exceeding legal limits were still detectable in wild mushrooms in Bavaria, Germany. Many monoculture mushroom farms went bankrupt as a result.

Although mushrooms were one of Krameterhof’s primary products at the time, they successfully weathered the crisis through the diversity of their produce. Today, the business at Krameterhof encompasses aquaculture, livestock farming, fruit cultivation, beekeeping, forestry, mushroom cultivation, and the growing of aromatic and medicinal plants.

● Terraced plots used for cultivation at Krameterhof.
Even as his reputation brought significant financial gains to Komehof Farm, the younger Holzer did not abandon agricultural production. He candidly shared with us that the farm now rests on three economic pillars: the sale of produce, education, and permaculture consultancy and planning services.

Although the latter has come to contribute far more financially than the sale of produce, he remains steadfast in maintaining the economic independence of each pillar. In his view, if agricultural production were subsidised by other revenue streams, it would eventually dwindle into a mere hobby, and the other two pillars would risk losing their very foundation.

III. Reflections

After a brief visit to Komehof Farm, one question continued to circle in my mind: what can a novice in sustainable agriculture, driven by ideals, actually learn from such an experience?

Perhaps, as the younger Holzer repeatedly emphasised, they may learn nothing at all. This is not only because the course lasts a mere two days, but because the model at Komehof Farm grew out of its own specific circumstances—and every individual and every farm is different.

Yet, perhaps there is something for everyone to take away. As a methodology, whether it is ‘recognising the limitations of the land and oneself to turn weaknesses into strengths’, or the embrace of pragmatic ambition, both serve as vital reminders for those new to farming. Even as a layperson in agricultural practice, I felt a profound resonance between these concepts and the methods of cultural research and artistic work with which I am familiar.

On the return journey, the surrounding pine plantations and dairy farms pulled me back to reality. In truth, monoculture and intensive production still dominate Austrian agriculture and forestry, and the influence of the permaculture championed by the Holzers remains limited. The younger Holzer’s insistence on a close kinship with nature, coupled with the farm’s idyllic landscape, could not help but strike me as something of a utopia.

● A monoculture plantation opposite the farm.

Therefore, the following questions remain: while we certainly need to learn from nature, have we also fashioned nature into something isolated and detached—a panacea for our contemporary dilemmas? How can alternative agriculture move beyond being a mere spiritual refuge to gain wider recognition and adoption, thereby prompting the public to address the broader, systemic social issues surrounding agriculture?

There are no definitive answers yet, but the course at Komehof Farm has at least sparked further reflection.

Foodthink Author

Xi Lei

Artist and researcher; Assistant Professor at the School of Art and Cultural Studies, University of Art and Design Linz, Austria, and a PhD candidate in Art Research. My interest in agriculture grew out of field research conducted for my creative work, and I hope to explore the possibilities of integrating artistic and agricultural practices.

 

 

Recommended by Foodthink

In November and December, two practical ecological agriculture training courses will be held in China: the ‘Vital Farming Introductory Course (25–26 Nov)’ in Taizhou, Zhejiang, and the ‘Localised Ecological Agriculture Technology Co-learning Camp (14–16 Dec)’ in Heyuan, Guangdong. Foodthink has frequently reported on and interviewed the veteran farmers and frontline experts leading these sessions. We welcome any interested farmers or readers to sign up.

– Vital Farming Introductory Course Registration –

– Localised Ecological Agriculture Technology Co-learning Camp –

Editor: Ze’en