The Atlantic Salmon Myth: The More We Farm, the More Endangered? | A Reading from a Great Book

Foodthink Says

The Atlantic salmon has a far more familiar name in China — salmon. Last week, we published an article on farmed salmon, “Has Salmon Truly Been ‘Freed’?”. But what of the survival prospects of wild salmon? We may have already forgotten what a truly wild salmon is. They are now virtually impossible to find on the market — not because their price is beyond the reach of ordinary people, but because they are vanishing from the planet at an alarming rate. Fifty years ago, half of every million salmon swimming toward the Atlantic successfully completed their return migration; today, that figure has plummeted to 3 per cent. In Eating to Extinction, BBC senior correspondent Dan Saladino chronicles precisely this unfolding “extinction”. While we tell ourselves that aquaculture has “liberated” wild salmon and given more people “salmon freedom”, the 400 million salmon penned in farms off the Norwegian coast outnumber the entire wild salmon population of the world. Meanwhile, the truly wild salmon — the ones capable of leaping over waterfalls, crossing oceans and completing a journey of thousands of kilometres — are on the verge of extinction…

◉ Dan Saladino and the English-language cover of Eating to Extinction. The following extract is taken from the chapter on “Wild Atlantic Salmon” in that book, with permission from the publisher Beiyue Books.

The Atlantic salmon is a creature of paradox. On the one hand, this fish has become one of the rarest animals in the ocean: very few of us will be lucky enough to see one (or taste it). On the other, fish farming has made it one of the most ubiquitous creatures on the planet. Within a few short decades, aquaculture has transformed what was once a delicacy enjoyed by the few into a global commodity and the most widely traded fish in the world. Perhaps, ten thousand years after humans first raised cattle, pigs and sheep, we have set this fish upon the same path: through farming, this animal now thrives in captivity (underwater fish cages at sea) yet vanishes from the wild. And yet we cannot help but worry about the fate of wild Atlantic salmon. This fish is a natural barometer of the planet’s condition, occupying an unrivalled position. It can transform itself from a freshwater fish into a marine one — and back again. This means that, as it progresses through its life cycle, it travels from inland rivers to the sea, then returns to the rivers. Through the salmon, we can observe the cumulative impact of a whole range of human activities — from deforestation, dam construction and pollution to overfishing and the driving of climate change — on the natural world. This dramatic decline is a clarion call for the changes underway in our land and sea. If we want to save the salmon, we must stop destroying the planet — it is as simple as that.

This fish is elusive, and its life cycle nothing short of miraculous. A female salmon lays roughly 8,000 eggs among the gravel of a riverbed, after which the males race to fertilise them with their milt. Eight weeks later, tiny fry hatch from the golden eggs and, for the next thirty days, live off the nutrients in their yolk sac. Growing from fry into parr, they can leave the shallow, gravel-strewn shallows and venture into deeper, more dangerous waters. In these depths, a salmon must survive for up to three years, finding enough food to reach 15 centimetres in length and developing sufficient muscle before it can finally embark on the great journey out to sea. It must complete thousands of miles of endurance swimming in the Atlantic before it can find abundant feeding grounds in its northern reaches. Thereafter, if it is lucky enough to evade predators and storms, two to three years later it will turn upstream, surmounting every obstacle in its path, back to the gravel stream where it first hatched. There, at the very spot marking both its beginning and its end, it will spawn. Of the original 8,000 eggs, only two will complete this entire life cycle. It is one of the most astonishing processes in the natural world.

◉ A juvenile Atlantic salmon in Scat Creek, Washington State. Photo credit: Roger Tabor/USFWS

To leave their freshwater home and swim into the salt sea, salmon undergo a physical transformation known as anadromous migration. Millions of years ago, as the oceans cooled and became richer sources of food, salmon evolved this biological trait. The process enables the salmon to undergo smoltification: its body becomes more streamlined, its skin turns silver and more reflective, providing better camouflage in the open sea. In the river, salmon are fiercely territorial and highly aggressive; yet as they move into deeper water and join other salmon in a shoal, their temperament grows more docile. In the lower reaches of the river, closer to the sea, the salmon takes one last soak in the water it is about to leave, absorbing its chemical signature. Scientists believe it is precisely this “imprinting” that enables the salmon to find its way home after journeying thousands of feet across the ocean. At the estuary, where freshwater meets the sea, the salmon transforms its gills and alters its breathing to adapt to the new environment, swimming close to the surface. There, it can fill its belly with macrozooplankton — crustaceans, squid, small fish and krill. Yet while hunting other creatures, the salmon itself becomes prey. Its predators include cormorants, sharks, sea lions, seals — and, of course, humans.

This incredible feat of the salmon population takes place across the North Atlantic, spanning more than 2,000 rivers and tributaries in Europe and North America. Atlantic salmon can be found from Norway in the north to Spain and Portugal in the south, from Russia in the east to Canada in the west. Yet wherever they originate, Atlantic salmon ultimately converge on the waters off the west coast of Greenland and near the Faroe Islands to feed. Here, every salmon doubles in size and packs on fat to withstand the cold of the North Atlantic and to build up the energy reserves needed for the return migration.

Much of what happens in the salmon’s life cycle belongs in Rachel Carson’s “ultimate mystery“. We do not truly know how salmon find their way back to migrate — it may be a combination of memory, scent, solar navigation and the Earth’s magnetic field — nor do we fully understand how they judge when to make the return journey. All we know for certain is that salmon will migrate at any cost. Near the town of Cloonheen in County Donegal, Ireland, along the 40-mile River Finn, the salmon encounters a seemingly impassable barrier. Water plunges over a 10-foot waterfall, crashing violently against the hard rock below. The salmon swims upstream from the pool beneath the falls and tries again and again to leap. Some fish fling themselves off the water or the rock face with their tails, bouncing up in stages, while others soar skyward in a single magnificent leap. At this stage, the migrating salmon is still drawing on its energy reserves. Once back in the river, whether it takes days, weeks or months to reach its birthplace, it will not feed again. Yet the salmon, having fed in the sea for years, is at the peak of its powers in every respect. And so, for the predators waiting on the riverbank — humans and animals alike — the returning salmon is at its very finest.

The poet Seamus Heaney loved fishing from a young age, and he cast his line for salmon east of the Cloonheen Falls in County Donegal, Northern Ireland. He recalls seeing salmon with their gleaming silver bodies, blue-green scales and torpedo-shaped heads, bursting through the surface as they drove themselves toward the waters where they were born. Heaney’s poem To Salmon, from an Angler was published in 1969. At the time, the total wild Atlantic salmon population stood at around 10 million. Today, that figure is fewer than 2 million. By contrast, another species — Pacific sockeye salmon (which diverged from the same evolutionary group as Atlantic salmon some 20 million years ago) — still returns in their tens of millions to the rivers of their birth. It is precisely this contrast that makes the catastrophic decline of the Atlantic salmon so terrifying. Fifty years ago, half of every million salmon leaving their rivers for the Atlantic successfully completed the return migration, spawning in their home waters and completing their life cycle. Today, only 30,000 salmon achieve this. Though the world strives to understand what has happened, we still cannot say with certainty why the Atlantic salmon has suffered such a precipitous decline. For any species, once numbers dwindle to this extent, the future becomes a precarious one. Some marine scientists believe that wild Atlantic salmon could genuinely face extinction.

◉ In May this year, the author of this book was interviewed by Foodthink at the Third International Conference on Agricultural Biodiversity.

The principal feeding ground for Atlantic salmon lies off the west coast of Greenland, where thousands of salmon from different rivers converge. Today, these waters have become a target for industrial fishing. In the 1970s, Norway’s vast fleets could catch two to three million salmon a year — more than the entire global salmon population today. Not until the 1980s was an international agreement reached to halt the indiscriminate plunder. Nowadays, most commercial salmon fishing has been banned, and in Ireland only a handful of historically licensed fishermen may cast their nets in the estuaries. In Scotland and the rest of Britain, and in Norway, net fishing has also declined sharply. Yet the salmon numbers keep falling. Something is seriously wrong in our rivers and seas.

Ken Whelan, Ireland’s foremost salmon scientist, believes that changes in ocean temperature are a major contributing factor. ‘In parts of the salmon feeding grounds, plankton has disappeared,’ he says. Meanwhile, new fish species have appeared along Ireland’s south coast. ‘The warming waters have brought Caribbean triggerfish and Mediterranean sea bream, which compete with the salmon for food. The sea is changing, and the salmon is one of its victims.’

And so the paradox emerges. While wild salmon numbers are falling, the total population of Atlantic salmon is rising rapidly. It is estimated that at any given moment, around 400 million salmon are confined in fish cages off the Norwegian coast. The salmon in just ten of these enormous cages alone outnumber the entire wild salmon population of every river, stream and stretch of the Atlantic Ocean in the world. As wild salmon dwindle, farmed salmon flourish. Some believe the two are linked.

◉ This chart shows the global production of the four main farmed salmonid species (in tonnes), from top to bottom: Atlantic salmon, Rainbow trout, Coho salmon and Chinook salmon. Farmed Atlantic salmon production exploded after the 1980s, surging from under 100,000 tonnes to over two million by 2010. Photo credit: Wikipedia; data source: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Species Fact Sheets.

The vast majority of the world’s farmed salmon comes from a handful of Norwegian fish-farming companies, including Lerøy Seafood Group and SalMar, the largest of all being Mowi. Mowi operates farms in Norwegian waters as well as in the Faroe Islands, Scotland, Canada and Ireland, and its output accounts for nearly a quarter of global salmon consumption. The company’s global operations even extend Atlantic salmon farming to the coast of Chile, south of the equator. I had the privilege of touring Mowi’s operations from start to finish on the west coast of Scotland. At the hatchery, I watched freshly hatched fry with their eyes still sealed tight within their eggshells. Mowi owns 25 farms in Scotland, and at one of them I saw hundreds of thousands of salmon swimming ceaselessly in circles inside a covered pen, now and then breaking the surface in a leap. ‘I entered this industry as an environmentalist,’ one of Mowi’s managers, Ian Roberts, told me as he showed me around the farm, ‘I wanted to stop fishermen taking the last wild salmon from the sea, so I offered them an alternative.’ He came to this view because, in recent decades, the growing global demand for fish has been met largely through aquaculture. More than half of the seafood humans consume now comes from fish farms.

◉ A modern salmon farm. Photo credit: Mowi
Inland from the west coast of Scotland, there is a farm belonging to Mowi, where the first seven months of a salmon’s life cycle are spent inside a vast, warehouse-like hatchery. At this hatchery in the Lochailart Industrial Estate, every minute detail of the salmon’s existence is controlled and monitored around the clock. Provided stress levels are kept low, salmon grow faster. At the top of a metal staircase, I watched 150,000 fish swimming clockwise in a giant tank of sterilised water. To trigger the physiological changes that turn a freshwater fish into a deep-sea one, the farm manipulates the lighting. For weeks on end the light is kept very dim, creating a “false winter” for the shoals; then the warehouse is flooded with light, as though spring has arrived. The shoal begins swimming in the opposite direction, its gills and skin starting to change. But at the Lochailart hatchery there is no river for them to follow to the sea. Instead, they are sent through enormous pipes into tanker lorries. All you can see is a frantic blur of dark shapes fighting against the pull of a pump, and even the strongest ‘swimmers’ manage a mere second’s hold in the transparent pipe. A converted whaler carries the salmon ashore to its next destination: a cluster of fish pens anchored by cages in a lake. There, after eighteen months, they are slaughtered and processed. Half will end up on British supermarket shelves; the rest are exported (farmed salmon is now one of the UK’s leading food exports). One of the fish pens I visited sits in Loch Leven, near Fort William. There, Mowi produces 1,600 tonnes of salmon a year — a mere fraction of its 500,000-tonne global output. From the shore, the pens look like several small islands in the middle of the lake. It was only when I motored my small boat close to one that I could make out the metal poles driven into the water to hold the pen in place, and the netting stretched overhead to keep birds from taking the salmon. Every few minutes, a scattering sound drifted from the wooden deck beside the pen, rather like kicking pebbles on a beach. It was an automatic feeder distributing protein pellets into the water. Twenty-two feet below the surface, sixteen fish pens lay hidden, with 500,000 salmon feeding within them. On current trends, wild fish taken from the sea will become ever scarcer while aquaculture grows ever larger. A practice originating in China has now gone global. In rice-paddy systems, fish keep the rice crops free of pests, and their waste fertilises the crop. In the 1970s, aquaculture underwent a fundamental transformation. Two Norwegian brothers, Sivert Grøtved and Ove Grøtved, recognised the decline of wild salmon and carried out an experiment in closed-system salmon farming. Near their fish farm on the island of Hitra, they placed wild Atlantic salmon into a floating net enclosure in a nearby fjord. The trial proved remarkably successful; the brothers sold the fish and made money. Norwegian fishermen soon followed suit. But they all began to realise that productivity was being limited by the salmon itself. Wild salmon grew too slowly and were poor at converting feed into fat and muscle. What fish farmers needed was the aquatic equivalent of “Tomorrow’s Chicken” or a Large White pig. At this point, a group of Norwegian animal breeders stepped in.

To find a solution, they drew on 200 years of experience in selective breeding. Robert Bakewell’s eighteenth-century principles still held true. In the 1940s, the American scientist Jay Lush, who revolutionised the US meat-processing industry, had further developed Bakewell’s theories. The Norwegian breeders borrowed ideas from Bakewell and Lush, and within a few years they had altered the genes of wild salmon. They selected fish with different traits from three rivers and bred a variety that grew faster and ate less than the wild salmon. The first generation grew 15 per cent faster than the old stock; ten years later, that figure had doubled. The fish the breeders reared were unmistakably salmon, yet in genetic terms they could be called a new variety altogether. Some scientists believe the difference between farmed salmon and wild salmon (Salmo salar) is so great that the new variety should be named “domesticated salmon” (Salmo domesticus).

Whether for the Norwegian breeders or the rest of the world, this was a breakthrough. The “Green Revolution” in wheat and rice had filled empty stomachs, and livestock specialists had created cheaper, more abundant meat supplies. Farmed fish could put this protein within more people’s reach. They believed the new breed would provide a fresh source of protein while helping to tackle overfishing. In reality, though, the trade-offs are far more complex than imagined.

I visited Mowi’s Loch Leven farm in February 2020. Just two weeks earlier, one of the company’s offshore pens at Colonsay had been torn open. The netting could not withstand the battering of Storm Brendan, and 74,000 farmed salmon escaped into the open sea. Placing pens in more distant, faster-flowing waters solved one problem encountered in sheltered inland waters: in the salmon industry, the waste generated within a pen — uneaten feed, faeces and chemicals — impacts the marine life and bay ecosystem beneath it. In turn, the bay ecosystem can destroy the fish within the pen; thick algal blooms threaten salmon life, damaging their gills and depleting oxygen in the water. Thousands of salmon can perish this way.

The salmon industry faces another equally intractable problem: sea lice. In the wild, these half-centimetre-long parasitic crustaceans co-evolved with salmon. When salmon live at sea, they may carry a few lice, but the parasites cannot survive in freshwater and are shed as the salmon swim upstream. However, fish pens packed with tens of thousands of salmon create a haven for sea lice. Once a single louse appears in a pen, it multiplies rapidly. The lice crawl across the salmon’s skin, seeking the softest tissue around the face and gills, and once they find it, they feed voraciously. A salmon grazed too heavily will die. Meanwhile, these “farmed” lice spread more widely, endangering wild salmon populations. Escaped farmed salmon also pose a threat to the long-term welfare of wild Atlantic salmon.

In the natural environment, the genetic difference between two salmon from different rivers exceeds the genetic difference between two people. After countless generations of evolution, each salmon population has adapted to the conditions of its home: the length of the river, its speed, the amount of food available, the water temperature, and the variety of tastes and scents in the water. The salmon in each river have adapted to local conditions, developing unique strengths and weaknesses, and evolving a life cycle uniquely suited to themselves. What makes all this possible is the wild salmon’s instinct for the return migration — its ability to find its way back to the waters where it was born in order to spawn.

Farmed salmon are different. Their breeding is based on a tightly selected set of genes, designed for just two purposes: to eat voraciously and to grow quickly. They lack the genetic toolkit needed to survive in the wild, and they cannot complete the great journey from river to sea and back to river again. When hundreds of thousands of farmed salmon escape from their pens, they may interbreed with wild salmon. Farmed females may survive and lay eggs, which then become fertilised in the rivers. Experts worry that such genetic introgression — the mixing of wild and farmed salmon genes — may gradually alter wild salmon populations, increasing their susceptibility to disease and predation.

……

In July this year, Foodthink, together with Beiyue Books — the publisher of Eating to Extinction — held three reading sessions as part of a series. Readers joined ecological smallholders from Sichuan, activists working to protect food diversity, scholars and charity-sector professionals in reading the book together and sharing stories and examples of food-diversity conservation from home and abroad. Click below to read the full transcripts and interviews: “Have We Truly Eaten More Varied Diets Than Before: Digging Wild Greens in the Netherlands”

Following a Chicken’s Trail Around the World

Fruits of Memory: From Diversity to Monoculture, What Has Disappeared Is Not Just Flavour

Growing Vanishing Glutinous Rice on the Hills of Sichuan

Eating to Extinction

Original title: Eating to Extinction:

The World’s Rarest Foods and Why We Need To Save Them

Author: Dan Saladino [UK]

Concept: Beiyue Books

Publisher: Wenhui Publishing House

Translator: Gao Yubing

Published: November 2023

Awards Recommended by The New York Times; Sunday Times Best Book of the Year; Britain’s highest honour for nature and travel writing — the Wainwright Prize; the “Oscars of Food” — the James Beard Award; as well as the Guild of Food Writers Award, the Fortnum & Mason Food and Drink Award and the Gregson Prize.

About the Author

Dan Saladino is a BBC journalist and broadcaster who produces in-depth stories for The Food Programme, specialising in food and agriculture. Over more than a decade he has visited more than 30 countries and regions and documented over 40 stories of endangered foods. He has been named among London’s most influential people of the year.

About the Translator

Gao Yubing holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Cambridge and a master’s degree from the Journalism and Media Studies Centre at the University of Hong Kong. She previously worked at financial institutions including JPMorgan. Her translations include The Birth of the Magic Pill, In the Currents of Whisky and Ink and 52 Blue, among others.