An Ecological Smallholder Farmer Watches “Snow Leopard”: Whom Should I Empathise With?

● The poster for the film “Snow Leopard”.

I. Who Really Cares About the Snow Leopard?

Pema Tseden’s posthumous film “Snow Leopard”, which won Best Picture at the Tokyo International Film Festival, tells a very simple story: on the Tibetan Plateau, a herder family’s sheep pen is attacked by a snow leopard, killing nine of their sheep. Four different groups then become embroiled in disputes and entanglements surrounding the incident. The herders are the ones who have suffered losses. The eldest son, Jinpa, has cornered the “culprit” snow leopard in the pen, guarding it firmly and insisting on waiting for government compensation before releasing it. The family’s youngest son, the young “Snow Leopard Lama”, harbours boundless compassion and sympathy for the snow leopard; he has twice shared a bond of life and death with this “involved” leopard, forging a profound connection between them. A devout follower of Tibetan Buddhism, he hopes his elder brother will release the leopard unconditionally. The local journalists who rushed to the scene upon hearing the news seem unconcerned about whether the snow leopard will be freed or whether the herders will receive compensation; they only want to capture more newsworthy footage. Even when the herders are at their wits’ end, the journalists continue to cheerfully celebrate a colleague’s birthday, enacting the adage that “the joys and sorrows of humanity are not shared”.

The grassroots officials and police officers who came to handle the situation merely urge the herders to release the snow leopard quickly, while the question of compensation is brushed aside with vague ambiguity. Their greatest fear is that if anything at all happens to this national first-class protected animal, no one could bear the responsibility.

● A still from “Snow Leopard”.
Grassroots officials demand that the snow leopard be released first, while the herders insist on compensation first, and so the matter falls into a stalemate. Of all the parties involved, only two take steps to try to break the deadlock. One is the “Snow Leopard Lama”, who offers to sell his camera — the one he uses for photographing snow leopards — to compensate his brother for the loss, but the proposal is refused. The other is the family’s elderly father, who brings out the travel money he has saved for years for a pilgrimage to Lhasa, trying to resolve the dispute.

II. A Film That Captures Only the Tip of the Iceberg

People need to raise sheep for income; snow leopards need to eat sheep to survive. Both are doing the right thing within their own worlds, yet this turns them into mortal enemies. The film “Snow Leopard” does not delve into why snow leopards attack herders’ livestock, focusing instead on the conflict of the incident itself. The snow leopard’s failure to be released appears to stem from Jinpa’s stubbornness: if only he would let go of the demand for compensation and release the leopard, everyone could live and let live. However, we cannot simply shift the blame onto the victim. This herder is not stubborn to an absolute degree: he frankly admits that if the leopard had only killed one or two sheep, he would not have made a fuss, regarding it simply as an offering to the spirits of the snowy plateau. But nine sheep were killed — for herders whose livelihoods are already arduous, this is undoubtedly a devastating loss. He also believes the root of the problem lies in his hunting rifle being confiscated, leaving the snow leopards’ behaviour entirely unchecked and causing them to grow ever bolder and more brazen. But is the reason snow leopards frequently attack herders’ livestock simply that herders lack guns to deter them? The most likely reason wild animals destroy crops and attack livestock is that their habitats have been squeezed or their survival is threatened. Whether it is overdevelopment by humans causing wildlife habitats to fragment progressively, or the upward shift of the tree line caused by global warming, both are factors that cannot be ignored.

III. Who Is Really Invading Whose Life?

The story in the film reminds me of the 2021 Yunnan elephant northward migration that captivated the nation. A herd of Asian elephants left their original habitat in the Xishuangbanna Nature Reserve and journeyed northward all the way to Kunming, 500 kilometres away, finally returning to their habitat only after intervention by the relevant authorities. Short-distance migration by elephants is not uncommon, but the distance this herd travelled northward far exceeds the scope of migration, and they did not follow a fixed route. Scientists therefore believe this was not migration at all, but rather a search for a new home. In fact, thanks to conservation efforts by both the government and civil society, the wild elephant population in China has grown from 193 in the 1990s to around 300 today. A growing population means they need more habitat. Yet urbanisation and increasing human disturbance have caused elephant habitat to fragment further, diminish and shrink. Restoring or expanding wildlife habitat, however, is a daunting and lengthy undertaking. In a reality where environmental problems are growing ever more severe and the “human–wildlife conflicts” depicted in the film occur with increasing frequency, how we should coexist harmoniously with wildlife is a question worth reflecting upon.

IV. As a Smallholder Farmer, Whom Do I Empathise With?

Had I watched this film a few years ago, when I was working in the city, it would most likely have been the compassionate young lama who moved me. Now, as a farmer, I find myself unconsciously empathising with the herders. Over the past year of practising ecological agriculture, I have come to understand only too well how many concessions and sacrifices farming without harming the environment truly demands.

● A peach tree that has just finished fruit bagging. The whole of May was spent on fruit thinning and fruit bagging for the apples and peaches.

After “graduating” from Foodthink’s first ecological agriculture internship programme, I came to Weihai to run a small ecological fruit orchard on my own. The orchard sits on the hillside at mid-mountain. To the north, just across a road, lies the natural scenic area up in the hills; to the south is a stretch of mixed woodland; on the east and west sides there are shallow gullies, beyond which lie other people’s orchards.

● The orchard is surrounded by mountains.

Since taking over this orchard last spring, I have been practising ecological cultivation: no chemical pesticides, no artificial fertilisers, making fermented plant extract, making compost, letting the grass grow, introducing more crop varieties and enhancing biodiversity. After all these efforts, without the technological “magic” of chemical pesticides and artificial fertilisers lending a hand, the first year’s yield was, as one would expect, pitifully low.

● Practising ecological agriculture: using weeds for composting.

Since the orchard sits on the edge of the forested mountains, traces of wild animals are a frequent sight — magpies, pheasants, hares and the like, a never-ending stream of visitors.

The birds love to dig up freshly sown seeds and eat them, or fly to the branches to peck at the biggest, ripest fruit. The hares are particular about their food: they turn up their noses at ordinary weeds and favour only plants from the Fabaceae and Brassicaceae families. Whether it is soybeans, peanuts, radishes or leafy greens, they are eaten clean the moment the seedlings emerge.

● The famous British illustrated tale “Peter Rabbit” tells the story of several clever, mischievous hares who pit their wits and courage against humans in a vegetable garden, and was even adapted into a film. When the story happens to you yourself, the hares don’t seem quite so cute any more.

Yet the neighbours in the orchard next door grow perfectly healthy vegetables — it is only my crops that suffer. After making some enquiries, I finally understood why birds rarely damage their crops. They coat their seeds with pesticide, which prevents both soil insects from eating the seeds and birds from digging them up. As for why the hares only come to my orchard, a comparison of the two sites makes it plain. In the other orchards, weeds are cleared away cleanly from the ground, while in mine the grass only gets cut once it reaches knee height. Hares would be far too exposed in their orchards, whereas mine offers cover everywhere.

Just like the herders in the film, I too initially blamed these wild animals for the losses in my orchard. After all, my original reason for choosing ecological agriculture was to protect the environment — yet once the orchard’s environment improved and attracted little creatures, I began to resent them.

● The orchard where the grass is left to grow has become a playground for small wild animals — a pheasant feather picked up on the ground.

After a spell of self-reflection, I began actively exploring ways to keep hares and birds at bay without causing them any harm. I tried fencing off the vegetable beds, but for one thing fences can’t stop birds, and for another, in Weihai’s winds — which easily reach Force 7 or 8 — my makeshift fence blew over almost as soon as I had put it up. I also tried using scent and sound to deter the hares, but that made no difference either. In the end, on a fellow farmer’s advice, I set up low tunnels from insect netting to shut out the birds and the hares, and I can now finally grow beans and vegetables on a small scale.

Compared to the orchard next door, where a spray of pesticide sorts everything out, I really am going through hoops. But all this toil and mental strain — I had steeled myself for it well before choosing the path of ecological agriculture, so it doesn’t feel like hardship.

● A low tunnel built from insect netting, on a fellow farmer’s advice.

While I empathise with the herders in the film when it comes to the trouble wild animals cause for farming and herding, our situations are fundamentally different. I decided to leave behind a glamorous city job (aka. the corporate-drone life at a Big Tech firm) and pursue ecological agriculture because I recognise that its essence is not simply to produce safe food, but to foster a harmonious, sustainable relationship between agriculture and the environment. Once I grasped the urgency and severity of climate change, I actively chose to forgo a portion of my “gain” as a farmer in favour of the natural world.

The herders, who live on the high-altitude plateaus and are largely “invisible” in modern society, almost entirely bear the consequences of ecological destruction by default. In the pursuit of high-speed GDP growth, we often rally with slogans about achieving a goal “at all costs”, yet rarely stop to ask whether those who truly pay “the price of development” do so willingly. It is only when environmental problems have become a vital global development issue that people begin to talk about wildlife conservation. In this process, we can see the government’s resolve and the efforts of researchers, yet we hear very little about the grassroots farmers and herders who suffer economic losses because of wild animals.

This is also why I have long admired the director Pema Tseden: he never employs a voyeuristic lens to depict the lives of Tibetan people. Instead, with a deep care for all life, he explores the complex relationships between ordinary individuals and the times, society, and nature.

“Snow Leopard” is like a prism refracting a host of social issues, inviting us to consider the philosophical question of how humanity and the natural world can coexist. Here I am, farming in the hills of Weihai, and I feel especially grateful to Pema Tseden for allowing me, in a small-town cinema a thousand li away, to truly see the herders’ plight. Stepping out of the cinema, I too will continue exploring, through the practice of ecological agriculture, a harmonious relationship between people and nature.

Foodthink Author
Li Pengyue
A former IT professional, now an ecological smallholder farmer, running a small ecological fruit orchard on her own in Weihai, Shandong. Participated in Foodthink’s first ecological agriculture internship programme. Deeply curious about and concerned with environmental issues.

 

 

 

 

All images, unless otherwise noted, are provided by the author

Editor: Mei Ying