Can a Farm Walk Cure City Dwellers’ Nostalgia?

Before I started my internship at Letian Bay Farm, I always assumed that the consumers here must be a pack of fervent environmentalists – there was simply no other explanation for why city dwellers would travel all the way out to the countryside. In an age when everyone is rushing towards the city, a path that runs so squarely against the current seems rather peculiar.

For a small-time citizen like me, the fantasy of Shanghai life goes something like this: after a day’s work at Lujiazui, seizing a rare slice of free time, taking a stroll along the Bund, sipping a little coffee, popping into museums and art museums. If the mood strikes for a Mediterranean diet, sling a Coach tote over your shoulder and head off to Costa or a big-box retailer like Sam’s Club, and pick up a couple of boxes of certified organic avocados.

Everything in the city is orderly, with prices clearly marked and fixed – so why drive two hours each way just to reach the countryside?

● Letian Bay Farm, where I am based, covers over 80 mu in total. Apart from more than 40 mu of woodland and over 20 mu of communal land, the remaining 20-plus mu have been cleared for cultivation and divided into an RV area or into small plots of just a fraction of a mu each, which are rented out to farm members. The vegetable plots are normally tended by the farm’s skilled workers, and members can either drive up to harvest their own produce or pay a delivery fee to have it brought to their door. For more stories about the farm, see my previous article “Coordinates in Shanghai: Half City, Half Pastoral Dream”.

I. What Can Only Be Found in the Countryside?

Is it the pursuit of healthy food? I ruled that out within my first week. The inherently unstable yields of ecological agriculture, combined with the farm’s limited growing area, mean the vegetables here simply cannot fully meet consumers’ needs. Beyond enjoying the farm’s ecological produce, they also accept products from Sam’s Club, Hema, Qingmei, wet markets and Meituan – the sources are remarkably broad. From what I have observed, health foods represented by the organic label do not occupy a central place in their daily food consumption. Even when the lady of the household stresses that she rented the plot for the sake of the family’s food safety, some of the men still cannot understand why they should come all this way to buy vegetables. And so, even though they have already rented a plot here and could enjoy produce free of chemical pesticides, food safety is not fully guaranteed.

Is it a desire to do one’s small part to protect the world’s environment and biodiversity? Regrettably, consumers almost never actively pursue environmental protection. Apart from recognising that pesticides are harmful to human health, they rarely bring up the impact pesticides have on the surrounding environment, let alone the wider world. No one has ever told me: because pesticide use is making the environment worse, I want to make a small change, and so I will rent a plot here, hoping that tiny streams can gather into great rivers and seas.

Not motivated by ecological protection, and seeming to lack any specialised understanding of organic farming itself, consumers’ choices look almost like a purely self-interested act: they focus only on what they can get out of it. Yet they are not even very sure what counts as healthy. When I mention the link between organic certification standards and health, consumers say: I am no expert – I don’t really know the specific criteria for organic food, it just feels healthier.

So why, in the end, do consumers choose to come here and rent a plot?

II. Is Ecological Agriculture a Form of Nostalgic Consumption?

From what I have felt at the farm, consumers’ choice to purchase ecological products here is, at heart, a wish to hold on to a few steady constants in a rapidly shifting modern society. Especially when consumers feel threatened, pressured or wounded by the world around them and are living in a state of psychological insecurity, they try to ease their anxiety by reaching back towards things of the past, seeking comfort in nostalgia to steady their negative emotions.

This longing for the past takes shape at the farm in various ways: the pursuit of the kind of harmonious neighbourly relations one expects in the countryside, the joy of harvesting vegetables that can go straight from the soil to one’s mouth without a quality inspection. The most tangible expression is the nostalgic space itself – members frequently mention meals cooked on the wood-fired stove, the experience of feeding the small animals, and so on. One consumer was particularly enamoured of the wood-fired stove: “This place is nothing like the other spots – you know, those agritourism places. It caught me from the very first moment, and I decided right away that I wanted to rent a plot here.” Mothers place more emphasis on the sense of security that comes from familiar spaces and familiar people. One mother went out of her way to stress how reassuring life is here: “You don’t have to tense up the way you do in the city, worrying about what resources to fight over. In the city everything is scarce – you have to jostle for a spot in the park at weekends. But here the space is vast, everything is enclosed at front and back, and the environment feels familiar, so when the children run around inside I feel easy. I don’t have to watch them every second – both grown-ups and children can truly relax… It feels like a community, like home… We don’t even peel our cucumbers. Just rinse them under the tap and eat them straight, because there’s nothing to worry about.”

● The firewood used on the farm. Wood-fired stove meals are a frequent draw for consumers.

Everything the farm presents feels like a composite. The land has not been fully converted into vegetable plots; instead, a generous amount of space has been left for play – such areas account for up to two-thirds of the farm’s total area. So alongside the cultivated plots, you can see plenty of green trees and water sources, watch children darting about everywhere, and even spot hedgehogs at night. In trendy parlance, this mix might be called “Ecology + Food + Parent-and-Child + Elderly Care + Camping + Nature Education + Other Activities.” It serves a diversity of needs: children’s play, older people’s retirement, office workers’ leisure, and middle-aged people’s tending of friendships. One mother went out of her way to stress how reassuring life is here

● A hedgehog spotted on an evening walk around the farm. Apart from a zoo, I had never seen a hedgehog in the wild before.
In the city it is hard to come by any real sense of ease. Living among strangers, an ordinary parent simply could not leave a child unattended in a park without constant vigilance. The city’s steep rents and labour costs make it crucial to economise every inch of space and skip every unnecessary step. When Ford invented the first assembly line, he urged everyone to stick to their role and hold their position. A wet market will stock only vegetables that meet its selling standards. To watch vegetables actually growing, you would have to seek out a commercial greenhouse or a home kitchen garden. Even the contact between consumer and producer is thought best kept to the briefest exchange, lest it delay the seller serving the next customer. In the city, efficiency is treated as the paramount value.

At the farm, everything runs the other way around. The organic label that can explain everything so quickly and simply is not the most important thing, because consumers can see and imagine, right in the soil, all that they have had no time to experience in the city.

III. How Do Consumers Judge Food?

On the farm you can watch the cultivation unfold before your eyes – a small seedling maturing over a few months into a head of cabbage, a pepper or an aubergine. For this very reason, organic certification does not become a significant factor here. There is no need to borrow an outside organic label to prove that vegetables have grown “healthily”; instead, people rely on their own way of judging: time and experience.

But does everyone carry the experience needed to judge the quality of food? There is a passage in The Omnivore’s Dilemma that, for all its quietness, resounds like a thunderclap: “In the food culture of the United States today, the indigenous wisdom that once guided what we eat has gradually faded, and what rises in its place is confusion and anxiety. Something as fundamental as ‘what to eat’ now requires a whole corps of experts to help us. We depend on professional journalists to investigate and tell us where our food comes from, and we need nutritionists to help us settle on the evening’s menu. How has it come to this?” Knowing what to eat and how to eat it – once a matter that spoke for itself – now actually requires expert guidance.

Answering questions about food is especially hard for children raised in the city. They do not understand how the world they interact with every day actually works, nor what secrets lie in the growth of a single ear of maize. Some children learn from poems that rice and barnyard grass are different, yet they have no idea what either of them actually looks like.

● Two plants, left and right – which is rice and which is barnyard grass? The answer will be revealed in the comments. Photo: Shen Ye

Middle-aged consumers reach for memory to picture what a vegetable ought to look like: insect holes, uneven sizes, a little imperfection. If it matches the shape and taste they remember from childhood, then it is “healthy”, “organic”, “ecological”.

For younger consumers, the severing of certain “traditions” occasionally makes judging food a challenge. I still remember a woman holding up a somewhat over-mature cauliflower and asking me: “Is this still edible?” You would never encounter such a question in a supermarket, where produce that looks unsightly or is past its prime is simply never put on the shelf. But at the farm you have to deal with plants growing as nature intends – much like those wilderness-survival television programmes set in the jungle, only without the contestants’ rich store of natural knowledge.

I am not sure whether this is an unspoken “sense of ritual” shared among city dwellers. Since I genuinely do not know either, I simply say I do not know, and watch them – clutching their cauliflower or a single cucumber – scuttle about the farm like chicks just out of the nest, seeking out the farm manager for an answer. Though they may lack all manner of common sense, one can still glimpse the need for conversation and connection that grows out of this.

Time and again, in the process of checking whether a crop has ripened or whether they have missed the best window for eating it, consumers forge a sturdier bond of trust with the people who grow their food, and gradually recalibrate their own understanding: a cauliflower that has begun to flower a little is still perfectly edible; an over-ripe cucumber can be turned into pickled cucumber; and if you visit every week, there is no need to rush and pick the green tomatoes – left to ripen naturally, they taste better.

● Factors such as sowing time, planting density, fertiliser and rainfall mean that vegetables of the same variety come in a range of sizes, and consumers without experience find it hard to tell which are still edible and which are not. Take the large carrot on the far left of this photo: though it has the shape most familiar to us from the market, its inner core has already lignified and is inedible.

For those a little older still, the standards of judgement are different again. Some people, trusting in the experience of the past, actually conclude that if a plant looks too well-tended, it must be a sham.

I once met a woman who used to grow her own vegetables. She said: “I’m sure your vegetables here still get a bit of pesticide sprayed on them. I used to grow my own – and these vegetables of yours –” She paused, tilted her head and jerked her chin at the round cabbage in the next plot, already eaten into a sieve of holes. “When we grew our own at home, how could we ever eat them? The pests took them all.” I was deeply struck by her commanding confidence in the field she knew so well; so much so that, though I wanted to push back, all I could manage was a small-voiced reply: “We use biopesticides, and from time to time we hand-pick the pests.”

IV. Possibilities Beyond Nostalgia

Returning to the question posed at the start of this article: are consumers driven purely by self-interest? The answer, of course, is no.

We might say that consumers’ scientific understanding of food, and their concern for the environment, have not reached a certain depth. Although we may lack such a profound scientific narrative, consumers can still start from ecological agriculture to pursue the bonds of trust and the rural culture that are slipping away. In this light, consumers are not self-interested; they, too, long for the beauty of a lost world to be revived in today’s society.

When I ask them why they bring their children here, they simply tell me: “Being in touch with nature is better for the children… things we used to see, our children have never seen… I don’t expect them to learn anything – I just want them to have a look…” It is a tradition that speaks for itself, like a myth: you may not understand the science behind it, yet you do not question the wisdom of doing it this way.

How to extend this nostalgia for a better life in the past to broader values – such as reducing food waste – is a question worth pondering. Repeatedly reaching for yield figures to answer the doubts raised about ecological agriculture seems to be falling into a trap of self-justification: for a single vegetable, is it waste for the insects to eat it, or waste for it to end up in a household bin? That does not seem hard to decide, and it is no wonder that many practitioners of ecological agriculture say: the insects take half, I take the other half.

A nostalgic space evocative of the pastoral idyll of old draws consumers in, but more important than the space itself is the emotional connection between people. For those who keep coming back, feeling sincerity and care in the experience matters. For that reason, they partly set aside the label-driven narratives of modern society, no longer using “organic”, size or variety to describe a vegetable, and trying to harvest and use everything their own plot yields – even if that means eating the same dish five days a week.

For the farm’s staff, they come with a wholehearted wish to change the state of agriculture, because the land offers not only the function of producing food but also encompasses social connection, education and so much more. When two such pursuits meet unexpectedly, both consumers and producers seem able to find peace in the space set apart that the farm provides, and to live a slower life. For young people weary of their office cubicles, this is where a new life begins.

● An evening gathering of the farm’s RV members.

 

Foodthink contributor

Xiao Cui

A Foodthink ecological agriculture intern from the second cohort. An anthropology student battling valiantly towards graduation, a maximalist at heart, a lover of food whose signature dish is stir-fried tomato and egg. She hopes to one day have her own balcony garden, with plans to grow tomatoes, cucumbers and chillies.

 

 

 

About the Ecological Farm Internship Programme

In early 2023, Foodthink announced recruitment for the second round of its “Ecological Agriculture Internship Programme”. Twenty-one interns were ultimately selected through the second round of screening and have since arrived at nine ecological farms across the country, beginning internship periods ranging from two months to one year.

Our aim is to connect young people keen to work in ecological agriculture with established ecological farms – helping the former to acquire farming knowledge and skills, while summarising and passing on the experience of veteran farmers, and addressing the shortage of skilled labour on the farms. Stay tuned for updates on the ecological agriculture internship programme!

Unless otherwise noted, all images in this article were taken by the author

Editor: Wang Hao